When Socialism Turns Institutions Into Spoils

An institutional analysis of how 21st-century socialism erodes checks and balances, destroys incentives and replaces promised equality with new extractive elites.

Institutions of Discord: The Extractive Ambiguities of 21st-Century Socialism
By Dr. Nelson Jorge Mosco Castellano

Why do nations that adopt socialism in the 21st century fail?
The answer is not found in the declared intentions of their leaders, nor in the mere fatality of global economic cycles.
It is found, as always, in institutions.
Throughout history, economic development and sustainable prosperity have depended on the existence of inclusive institutions: those that secure property rights, guarantee an independent judicial system, foster a level playing field for innovation, and limit the discretionary power of Leviathan.
The drama of 21st-century socialism — from Latin America to the hyper-regulatory temptations in the West — is that, under the banner of social justice, it systematically dismantles these rules of the game, replacing them with extractive institutions that concentrate political and economic power in the hands of a new elite.
Let us examine the complexities and structural failures of this model through the lens of institutional economics.
The Erosion of Checks and Balances and the Triumph of Discretionary Power
The first and most serious contradiction of 21st-century socialism is its inherent conflict with political pluralism.
To implement radical and rapid redistribution, these regimes require a hypertrophied Executive.
The result is the deliberate weakening of institutional checks and balances.
When the separation of powers erodes and justice loses its independence, property rights become contingent upon political loyalty.
As we have demonstrated in our research on historical development, the lack of legal certainty destroys incentives for long-term investment.
If entrepreneurs and citizens fear that the fruits of their effort may be expropriated or asymmetrically regulated by decree, capital — both financial and human — simply flees.
Inclusive institutions are transformed into extractive ones, where economic success no longer depends on productivity, but on proximity to state power.
The Blockage of Creative Destruction and the Problem of Incentives
Sustainable economic growth is not a static process; it is a dynamic process of creative destruction, a concept coined by Joseph Schumpeter.
It requires new technologies, ideas and companies to displace old and inefficient ones.
21st-century socialism blocks this engine in two ways:
Price fixing and the destruction of signals:
By attempting to control prices and exchange rates in order to subsidize present consumption, the State eliminates the free price system, which is the most efficient information mechanism a society possesses.
Without these signals, resource allocation becomes blind, leading to chronic shortages and black markets.
The suffocation of the innovative incentive:
Through confiscatory taxes and narratives that penalize the legitimate accumulation of capital, the incentives of economic agents to take risks and innovate are destroyed.
When the State attempts to replace entrepreneurial spirit with centralized planning or inefficient state-owned enterprises, productivity collapses.
The Resource Trap and Global Vulnerability
No modern economy operates in isolation.
The most radical experiences of 21st-century socialism in the present century have exposed a profound paradox: their absolute dependence on the very forces of global capitalism they claim to combat.
These administrations usually expand public spending on the basis of temporary booms.
However, by destroying the internal non-extractive productive fabric through regulations, the country falls into an aggravated form of “Dutch disease.”
The extractive institutions created to capture rents from productive sectors are incapable of diversifying the economy.
When international prices or circumstances fall, the model collapses.
Lacking an institutional structure that fosters internal technological innovation, the State is left disarmed in a globalized world where intellectual and financial capital migrates instantly toward more predictable and secure jurisdictions.
The Reappearance of the Nomenklatura: State Capture and Rent-Seeking
Socialist discourse promises to dismantle oligarchic hierarchies.
However, the laws of political and economic science show us that the concentration of economic power in the State does not eliminate privileges; it merely changes the identity of the privileged.
Some in power obtain extraordinary discounts from their suppliers.
By enlarging the state apparatus to turn it into the main employer and allocator of resources, an ideal environment is created for rent-seeking.
Bureaucrats and regime-friendly businessmen, in a form of crony capitalism, do not create wealth; they compete to capture the rents distributed by the State through discretionary licenses, subsidies, direct purchases designed to compensate favors, and directed contracts.
This consolidates what the sociologist Milovan Đilas called the “New Class” or Nomenklatura: an extractive elite that uses the state monopoly to enrich itself at the expense of civil society, perpetuating poverty under a rhetoric of equality.
The Technological Crossroads: Inclusion or Digital Despotism?
The 21st century offers unprecedented technological tools that represent the final and most contemporary challenge for these regimes.
Technology is not neutral; its impact depends on the institutional matrix on which it rests.
On the one hand, the decentralization of information through global networks and platforms represents a threat to the control of the official narrative, allowing citizens to organize against abuses of power.
On the other hand, we observe with concern how regimes with strong extractive institutions see in digitalization — such as central bank digital currencies, or CBDCs, and algorithmic surveillance systems — a golden opportunity to move toward digital despotism.
Total control over economic transactions and the biopolitical surveillance of citizens would allow them to close spaces of dissent in a way that 20th-century dictators could only dream of.
Conclusion: 21st-century socialism stumbles over the same stone as its predecessors: the illusion that economic prosperity can be achieved by destroying political freedom and market mechanisms.
And it stumbles internationally.
There are no shortcuts to development, as the lesson of economic history makes clear.
There are shortcuts to becoming rich, enjoying good cars, travel and privileges.
Without political institutions that limit the power of the State and guarantee equal individual rights, any project of social engineering is condemned to lead to economic stagnation, oligarchic capture and the weakening of human agency.
The gap between the potential of our technological era and the reality of these models of government is the clearest testimony to this institutional failure; and to legal theft.

Extractive institutions.
Discretionary power.
Digital despotism.

Continue reading in Global Order & Geopolitics