Rousseau Becomes Ridiculous

Artificial intelligence exposes the slowness of a political system designed for a world that no longer exists.

When Rousseau Becomes Ridiculous
The agentic alternative postponed by a collapsed political system
By Dr. Nelson Jorge Mosco Castellano

Alvin Toffler did not exactly coin the literal phrase “whoever controls information will control the world”, a maxim often attributed instead to Nathan Rothschild in the nineteenth century or to the popular culture of espionage. But he was the great theorist who structured and popularized that same premise on a global scale.
Toffler’s formal and detailed warning about the absolute power of information was consolidated in two key milestones of his work.
The first conceptual break was Future Shock, published in 1970.
Although the focus there was on how the speed of technological change and information overload could destabilize societies, Toffler was already warning that knowledge was displacing traditional productive factors.
The central thesis arrived with The Third Wave, published in 1980.
There, Toffler divided human history into three great movements or “waves”.
The First Wave was the agricultural revolution, where wealth was land.
The Second Wave was the industrial revolution, where wealth was capital and machines.
The Third Wave was the information revolution.
In The Third Wave, Toffler explicitly explained that control over information, data and computer technology would replace control over physical force and money.
For him, information was becoming the central resource of individual sovereignty and state power.
If we seek the exact moment when Toffler dissected political and economic power strictly linked to information, we find it in his book Powershift, published in 1990.
In that work, Toffler develops the triad of power: force, as muscle; wealth, as money; and knowledge, as mind.
His conclusion was blunt: knowledge, which includes information, data and computing, is the highest-quality form of power, because it can be used to multiply force and wealth, or to avoid them altogether.
Whoever controlled access to and distribution of knowledge would control the power structures of the twenty-first century.
In short, although the idea was already present in the atmosphere of the Cold War, it was between 1980, with The Third Wave, and 1990, with Powershift, that Alvin Toffler formally warned the world that the true battlefield for global dominance would no longer be territory or factories, but control over the flows of information.
The speed with which this vertiginous change of era is being processed, in order to provide effective and efficient alternatives to the problems of postmodern society, also definitively calls into question the organization of the traditional powers on which “democratic” government is structured.
Temporal obsolescence leaves the human management of three anomic, anarchic and useless powers out of play, and places governments and oppositions before a crossroads of inoperability. One side permanently justifies its lies. The other pretends to control through theatrical simulations that no one cares about.
The entire Rousseauian system collapses before the novelty of artificial intelligence and exposes the extremely high cost of the abuse of resources by representatives over those they claim to represent.
It is an unsustainable cost, particularly in this change of era, which would allow the use of agentic tools to manage both private and public affairs with perfectly designed sustainable objectives, and with an intelligent control of management endowed with unsurpassed effectiveness.
It seems, then, that no one has read Toffler.
Or perhaps they fear losing privileges by incorporating the optimized management of knowledge.
It becomes clear that there are no leaders prepared for this quantum time, except to continue “perfecting” the “art” of war.
The diagnosis is as surgical as it is undeniable: what we are witnessing is not another disastrous circumstantial failure of governance, and there have been many, but the terminal crisis of an institutional Matrix designed for a world that no longer exists.
The rhythm of state bureaucracy, artificially multiplied to surf corruption, collides head-on with the speed of technological change.
The political system, and part of the religious summit, have entered a state of irreversible collision panic with an extreme, artificially intelligent opus that sweeps dialectics away as a form of decision-making.
It is simply, and nothing less than, a perfected tool of accumulated human wisdom, handled by an algorithm built through scientific stubbornness, that is radically changing the world.
The fear of the tool is the same fear that appeared when humanity had to decide whether fire should be used to improve quality of life, or whether, because it was potentially dangerous, it should be extinguished.
Ethics and morality are supplied by whoever uses the instrument.
Restricting the freedom to use it will only create fiefdoms of privilege.
When presidential or parliamentary debate appears as rhetorical fireworks of crossed accusations and reciprocal blame, while solutions are conspicuously absent, what it stages is the impotence of the traditional division of powers to provide an adequate and definitive response to a reality that overwhelms them, and exposes them on YouTube as buffoons of the Middle Ages.
We have within reach an X factor that can solve it.
An indeterminate, crucial and often invisible element capable of significantly altering the outcome.

Toffler and information power.
Political obsolescence.
Artificial intelligence and governance.
Freedom versus privilege.

Continue reading in Global Order and Geopolitics