Author name: Nelson Jorge Mosco Castellano

A reflection on fiduciary responsibility, institutional checks and balances, and the political consequences of replacing evidence with political narratives.

A critique of Uruguay’s pension system through the analogy of a Ponzi scheme and the use of mandatory savings as a mechanism for financing the State.

A critical analysis of the limits of social dialogue when investment, work, and fiscal sustainability are pushed aside in Uruguay.

According to the author, the fiscal burden of political and business decisions made during the 2010–2015 period continues to weigh on Uruguay’s public finances and future generations.

The transformation of a political record into a children’s fable as a strategy of cultural hegemony and historical amnesia.

The debate over social transfers reflects two opposing views of the State: the targeted management of public resources versus the political use of social assistance.

An examination of the relationship between economic freedom, institutions, private property and migration through the ideas of Hayek, Mises, Acemoglu and Thomas Sowell.

The government’s shift on pension funds reveals the limits of ideological proposals when confronted with the practical demands of financing the state and sustaining economic stability.

Fiscal discipline does not weaken a nation’s independence. It strengthens it by reducing dependence on creditors, financial markets, and the constraints of economic scarcity.

The collapse of real socialism did not end its political influence.